India's Independent CCUS Advisory Centre — Powered by WSSH Australia
+61 02 8600 8000 admin@nationalccusmission.org
Powered by WSSH Australia
Home / Capture / Post-Combustion Capture
Capture Technologies

Post-Combustion Capture

The world's most widely deployed carbon capture pathway β€” amine and solvent scrubbing of industrial flue gas. Proven at gigaton scale from Norway's Sleipner to Canada's Boundary Dam. NCM delivers post-combustion capture solutions calibrated to India's coal quality, water stress, and financing constraints.

How It Works

Separating COβ‚‚ from Flue Gas β€” The Proven Industrial Standard

TRL 9. 40+ commercial licensors. Applicable across all of India's major emission sectors.

Post-combustion capture (PCC) is the process of removing COβ‚‚ from flue gas after fuel combustion has taken place. Flue gas from a coal power station, blast furnace, cement kiln, or chemical plant is passed through an absorber column where COβ‚‚ reacts with a chemical solvent β€” most commonly a monoethanolamine (MEA) or proprietary advanced amine formulation β€” forming a COβ‚‚-rich liquid. This liquid is then heated in a regeneration unit to release concentrated COβ‚‚ gas, which is dried, compressed, and transported for storage or utilisation. The lean solvent is cooled and returned to the absorber for reuse.

The primary advantage of post-combustion capture is its retrofit applicability β€” it can be added to existing industrial plants without requiring fundamental process modifications. This makes it the most relevant technology for India's existing stock of coal power stations, integrated steel mills, and cement plants, where replacing the core process is economically impractical. The technology is commercially proven at industrial scale at Norway's Sleipner offshore facility, Canada's Boundary Dam power station, and Quest (Shell, Canada), among more than 30 reference installations globally.

The primary challenge of post-combustion capture is energy consumption β€” the regeneration step requires significant heat, typically supplied by low-pressure steam extraction from the host plant. Under Australian and European energy prices, this energy penalty is manageable. Under India's specific energy cost conditions β€” which vary significantly between grid power, captive coal, and waste heat recovery β€” the economics require careful site-specific assessment. NCM's PCC evaluations always include an India-calibrated energy integration study.

Amine Scrubbing (MEA / Advanced Amines)
The most commercially mature route. MEA is proven but energy-intensive; advanced proprietary amines (Shell CANSOLV, MHI KS-21, Fluor Econamine FG+) offer 15–25% energy savings but carry licensing costs.
Ammonia-Based Capture (CAP)
Chilled ammonia process β€” lower regeneration energy than MEA, higher ammonia slip management requirements. Alstom/GE CAP process has reference plants in Europe.
Membrane Separation
Emerging PCC variant using COβ‚‚-selective membranes β€” lower energy, modular, suited to smaller Indian industrial sites. TRL 6–7 β€” NCM maps deployment readiness trajectory.
Solid Sorbent Capture
Temperature or pressure swing adsorption using solid materials β€” potentially lower energy penalty than liquid amines. Several processes approaching commercial scale with strong applicability to Indian conditions.
India Application

Post-Combustion Capture Across India's Key Sectors

NCM's sector-specific PCC assessments account for India's unique industrial conditions β€” coal quality, ambient temperature, water availability, and grid economics.

⚑

Coal Power Stations

India's 210 GW coal fleet produces the highest-concentration, highest-volume flue gas streams for PCC. Retrofit feasibility depends on plant age, remaining operating life, flue gas composition, and proximity to storage. NCM screens the entire NTPC and state utility fleet for PCC viability.

βš™οΈ

Integrated Steel Mills

Blast furnace gas and basic oxygen furnace off-gas have different COβ‚‚ concentrations β€” blast furnace top gas typically 20–25% COβ‚‚, BOF gas up to 45% COβ‚‚. Higher concentration reduces capture energy penalty significantly. JSW, Tata Steel, SAIL, RINL β€” all have PCC-applicable emission streams.

🧱

Cement Plants

Cement kiln exhaust is typically 14–33% COβ‚‚ β€” higher than coal power flue gas β€” improving PCC economics. UltraTech, ACC, Shree, Ambuja, Dalmia β€” India's major cement producers are all viable PCC candidates. NCM has assessed kiln configurations across all major Indian cement clusters.

Indian Parameters

Why PCC Performance in India Differs from Global Benchmarks

India's high ambient temperatures β€” 35–45Β°C across major industrial zones including Chhattisgarh, Odisha, Andhra Pradesh, and Rajasthan β€” significantly affect post-combustion capture performance. Absorber column efficiency decreases at higher temperatures, cooling water requirements increase, and compressor efficiency drops compared to the 15–20Β°C reference conditions used by most licensor performance guarantees. NCM's thermal models incorporate seasonal temperature variation across all major Indian industrial corridors.

India's coal is characterised by high ash content (25–45%) and high sulphur content in some seams β€” both of which affect PCC solvent performance. High particulate loading requires enhanced flue gas pre-treatment to protect absorber packing and prevent solvent contamination. High SOβ‚‚ content causes accelerated solvent degradation and increased solvent make-up costs. NCM's PCC assessments include a full flue gas characterisation step using Indian coal quality data rather than international reference conditions.

Water stress is a critical constraint in many Indian industrial regions. MEA-based PCC requires significant cooling water for the condenser and intercoolers β€” a resource that is severely constrained at sites in Rajasthan, Gujarat, and parts of Maharashtra. NCM preferentially evaluates dry-cooled PCC variants and water minimisation designs for water-stressed Indian industrial sites, and quantifies the incremental capital cost of water-efficient designs against the baseline.

14–33%

COβ‚‚ concentration in cement kiln exhaust β€” higher than coal power, improving PCC economics

20–25%

COβ‚‚ in blast furnace top gas β€” enabling efficient post-combustion capture at Indian steel mills

15–25%

Energy penalty reduction achievable with advanced amine formulations vs. standard MEA

TRL 9

Technology readiness level β€” PCC is the most commercially mature capture technology available today

Global Reference Projects

PCC Proven at Scale β€” Lessons NCM Brings to India

πŸ‡³πŸ‡΄
Sleipner, Norway (1996–present)
World's first industrial COβ‚‚ capture and storage. Amine-based PCC on natural gas processing. 1 MT/year injected. 28 years of continuous operation β€” the definitive proof of PCC long-term viability.
πŸ‡¨πŸ‡¦
Boundary Dam, Canada
World's first post-combustion CCS on a coal power station. 1 MT/year capacity. Demonstrated retrofit applicability and licensor performance in real grid operation conditions.
πŸ‡ΊπŸ‡Έ
Petra Nova, USA
The world's largest post-combustion CCS project on a coal power station at time of construction. 1.4 MT/year. Key lessons in large-scale amine plant integration with power generation.
πŸ‡¬πŸ‡§
Net Zero Teesside, UK
Multi-emitter industrial cluster applying PCC across gas power, chemicals, and waste β€” demonstrating shared capture infrastructure economics applicable to Indian industrial corridors.
πŸ‡©πŸ‡ͺ
Heidelberg Materials, Germany
World's first carbon-neutral cement plant. Post-combustion capture on cement kiln exhaust β€” directly applicable to India's 380 MT/year cement production fleet.
πŸ‡¦πŸ‡Ί
Quest CCS, Australia (Shell)
Post-combustion capture on steam methane reforming hydrogen plant β€” applicable to India's refinery and fertiliser sector hydrogen production.

Ready to Work With India's Leading CCUS Practice?

Whether you are a government body seeking policy advice, an industrial company facing CBAM exposure, or an investor seeking CCUS project opportunities β€” our team is ready to engage.